Welcome, Guest! Sign In New here?  Register Send us a News Tip     Give us Feedback
Partly Cloudy, 79°
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Schools
B-Ball coordinator resigns over ability grouping
Scott Brinton/Herald
Saul Lerner, the Bellmore-Merrick Central HigH School District athletic director, recently resigned as the Section VIII boys' basketball coordinator.

Saul Lerner, the Bellmore-Merrick Central High School District athletic director, recently resigned his post as coordinator of the Nassau County Boys' Basketball Committee because, he said, the Section VIII Athletic Council rejected a proposal of his to fine-tune the seeding process that ultimately determines teams' playing schedules.

In 2006, Lerner was the architect of an ability-grouping system that determined a team's conference by its record. Previously, teams were assigned to conferences without much regard to their records. Rather, officials used what they called the "snake," in which teams were seeded and then laid out on a grid that wound back and forth in serpentine fashion.

The first-, sixth-, seventh-, 12th-, 13th-, 18th- and 19th-seeded teams played in Conference I. The second-, fifth-, eighth-, 11th-, 14th-, 17th- and 20th-seeded teams played in Conference II, and so forth. It was clear at the start of the season that the top-seeded teams would likely come out ahead at the end of the season, and would blow out the bottom-seeded teams, often by 50 points or more.

Lerner moved to an ability-grouping format, in which the first, second-, third-, fourth- , fifth-, sixth-, seventh- and eighth-seeded teams played each other in Conference I, and so on down the line. The system balanced games out. There were few, if any, 50-point blowouts, and conference winners were much less predictable. When the system took effect in 2007, there were crossover games between the conferences. In 2008, the system was further modified, with no crossover games.

Coaches in the top conferences then complained that their players had no breaks during the season. They always played hard-fought games, which strained their best players. At the same time, teams in the lower divisions had an unrealistic sense of how good they really were, Lerner said. The best team in Conference IV, for example, ended the season as conference champion, while the eighth-seeded team in Conference I, which might have easily defeated the Conference IV winner, might well end the season with a losing record.

E-mail this
Print this
You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to log in.
Photos
Videos
Your News
FindItLI.com
or Search by category
Terms of Use | Advertising | Careers | Contact Us             © 2010 Richner Communications, Inc. | Powered By: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.