Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Partly Cloudy, 26°
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Artificial turf revisited
By Scott Brinton
Scott Brinton
A recent view of Calhoun High School's natural-grass field

An ad hoc group of students and high school parents converged on the Bellmore-Merrick Central High School District Board of Education meeting Sept. 2 to call on district officials to reconsider their 2007 stance against synthetic-turf football fields at Calhoun, Kennedy and Mepham high schools.

Roughly 250 parents and their children attended, with young people donning Merrick Police Activity League, Merrick-North Merrick Little League, Bellmore Braves and Calhoun football jerseys.

In response to recent calls for artificial turf, Board of Education President Diane Seaman announced at the meeting that the district was forming a committee to explore ways to improve the high schools' football fields. She noted that the committee would look not only at synthetic turf, but also at ways to upgrade maintenance of the current grass fields.

"It's not just synthetic turf that we're talking about," Seaman stressed.

She said that the committee and its subcommittees would report to Superintendent Henry Kiernan, who would issue a recommendation to the Board of Education in the coming months.

Anyone interested in joining the committee is asked to submit a letter describing their interest and expertise to the Bellmore-Merrick Central High School District Board of Education, 1260 Meadowbrook Road, North Merrick, N.Y. 11566, by Sept. 16. The first committee meeting is scheduled for Sept. 29 at 6 p.m.

Proponents of artificial turf say that it would allow continuous play on the fields, and eliminate concerns about damage when played on in rainy weather. They also say it would reduce maintenance, including watering and fertilizing.

Opponents say its high cost would force the district to raise property taxes at the outset. And a number of health and environmental groups continue to question whether the turf is potentially hazardous, despite a recent report that it is safe.

Skip Haile, a founder of the parent group Time for Turf, said the Central District's new committee is "a wonderful step in the right direction."

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Comments
1 comment on this item

The L.I. Herald should be commended for doing such a fine job of researching and reporting on the issues presented by the debate over utilizing synthetic turf for school athletic fields. Unfortunately, as the article by Scott Brinton points out, the ground up tires that are used for the synthetic turf's substrate contain a wide spectrum of chemicals that present health and environmental concerns. It is true that the state environmental department issued a report that has been relied upon by school districts to dismiss concerns when considering switching fields to synthetic turf. However, it is important to note that this report was very limited in scope.

Rather than argue in this letter that synthetic turf simply should never be used, I would like to ask a more basic question. Are there alternative designs for synthetic fields (which do not rely upon contaminated tires) that could be considered for use? Generally, when an environmental impact statement (EIS) is completed, the question about safer alternatives is one of the key questions that must be studied. However, the decisions to build synthetic turf fields at local schools are being made without the benefit of EIS studies. Without environmental impact studies, there is no requirement to evaluate alternatives which minimize or avoid environmental concerns. The Bellmore-Merrick Central High School District should be commended for not just rushing ahead, but instead creating a committee to study this issue before a decision is made.

One of the fundamental tenets of environmental protection is that once environmental hazards have been identified, every effort should be made to investigate alternatives that may minimize or avoid the negative environmental impacts of the proposal. In the case of synthetic turf, the obvious question is whether anyone is providing synthetic turf fields that don’t rely upon contaminated tire mulch as a substrate? My research has found the short answer to be yes. One such company is TaragaPro, which utilizes Organite, an alternative sub-surface that avoids tire mulch and silica. There may also be other companies with similar products. I don’t understand why schools investigating synthetic fields are not first considering alternatives that could avoid the environmental hazards presented by the increasingly popular proposal to remove grass fields and replace them with a system built on used tire crumbs.

Neal Lewis is the executive director of the Sustainability Institute at Molloy College.

You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to log in.
Photos
Videos
Your News
Sal Del Genio , New Hyde Park NY 11040 more …
Terms of Use | Contact Us             © 2010 Richner Communications, Inc. | Powered By: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.