Report Inappropriate Comments

I agree with shibas1 here. The vet report is what I think is the most important evidence here because otherwise it becomes a case of he said/ she said.

What I find most disturbing is that the tenant Miller claims he saw Mitchell Marsicano assault the dog on a previous occasion. He claims he saw Marsicano raping the dog (it is not having sex with the dog, it is rape ) and that he was going to report the abuse, but that Marsicano threatened him. I'm sorry, but that is no excuse not to report this appalling behaviour and to leave the dog vulnerable to have this happen again.

I also find it particularly appalling that he would get charged 15 years for burglary, but only 1 year for the rape. That is NOT justice.

From: Man charged with sexually abusing his pet dog

Please explain the inappropriate content below.