Work with us
Mostly Cloudy,78°
Thursday, May 26, 2016
OK, I'll say it: Teachers deserve tenure
(Page 2 of 3)
To fully understand the importance of tenure, we look back at its origins. The National Education Association, the nation’s largest teachers union, formed in the late 19th century. Instituting teacher tenure was high on its agenda. In that era, teachers could lose their jobs because they taught “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.” A female teacher could be fired if she got married, became pregnant or wore pants to school, according to the nonprofit, nonpartisan ProCon.org.

Teachers recognized the precariousness of a job in which they were beholden to numerous stakeholders –– not only students, but also parents, school administrators, board trustees, even elected leaders, each with their own beliefs and agendas.

According to Time magazine’s “A Brief History of Tenure,” published in 2008, New Jersey passed the first tenure law, covering all teachers in kindergarten through 12th grade, in 1910.

University professors, too, saw the need for tenure back then. Their primary concern was academic freedom, according to the American Association of University Professors, of which I am a member. It all started in 1900, when renowned Stanford University economist Edward Ross was summarily dismissed because Jane Stanford, the university’s co-founder, with her husband, Leland, didn’t appreciate Ross’s views on immigrant labor and corporate monopolies, the AAUP’s website states.

John Dewey, a Columbia University professor of philosophy and education, and Arthur Lovejoy, a Johns Hopkins University philosophy professor, organized the AAUP’s first meeting in 1915, primarily to fight for academic freedom –– meaning professor tenure.

Tenure is now standard practice at all levels of the American education system, from primary to university. It has served our democracy well for over a century.

Critics say that too many teachers are rated effective or highly effective. There must be more bad apples, but tenure protects them. They point to a handful of high-profile cases in which teachers have committed egregious errors and have remained in the classroom.


2 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

Yes, I understand where Scott Brinton is coming from. His parents were (tenured?) teachers and he is as well. All will agree that tenure is a great benefit for teachers.

It is almost impossible to dismiss a teacher that has tenure.

And tenured educators contribute to Long Islands high taxes. Do tenured teachers earn their guaranteed compensation?

Maybe we should expand tenure to for-profit businesses- which could result in a $10. apple.

Wednesday, July 16, 2014 | Report this

Did you ever wonder how good workers in the private sector continually get raises if bosses only want the lowest salaried workers? (In the private sector we call them bosses, not principles, and some of them are also big meanies.)

Instead of letting the mediocre and incompetent teachers block merit pay, let schools offer higher salaries to attract and reward great teachers, just like is done in the private sector. Unlike the union's philosophy that all teachers are commodities of equal value, the private sector knows that a good worker is worth much more than a mediocre one.

And that works both ways. In the private sector, workers can leave unpleasant working conditions and go work at their boss’s competitors.

Friday, July 18, 2014 | Report this
Terms of Use | Advertising | Careers | Contact Us | Community Links © 2016 Richner Communications, Inc.