Home
Classifieds
Subscribe
Work with us
Fair,65°
Saturday, September 5, 2015
Adopting flood map a beginning, not an ending
(Page 2 of 2)

We believe that FEMA did a better job the second time around, but parts of the new map still miss the mark. Hurricane Sandy showed the areas of Valley Stream that are vulnerable to coastal flooding — exactly what flood insurance protects against. And it showed that there are some areas that have no business being in the high-risk flood zone.

Village officials promised at the July 15 meeting that adopting the new map would not mean an end to the fight, and that they would continue lobbying the federal representatives and agencies that can effect change. They must make good on this promise.

The argument made by some residents that the new map can never be changed is wrong. This map is a changed map, and future maps can be as well.

We continue to call for more constructive cooperation between the community activists focused on this issue and the village government. It has been frustrating to see these two factions sniping at each other, despite the fact that they are working toward the same goal.

Both groups have brought good ideas to the table, yet they seem to prefer to work independently to solve the problem. Residents share personal experiences about the financial burden of having to purchase unnecessary flood insurance. The village government has relationships with the federal officials who can bring about change. Both sides should realize that we’re all on the same side.

Instead of publicly trading barbs, how about a meeting of the minds? If community activists and village officials could sit down, talk and learn from one another, we believe everyone could end up on the same page. Moving forward as one united coalition is a lot more likely to get Valley Stream the attention it needs for the changes that still need to be made.

Comments

1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
Sandeep

Problem is if you are barely in a flood zone and never flooded you get $31,900 worth of free flood insurance from FEMA.

I you did not get water in Irene or Sandy odds are you are getting no water or very little water. You are forced to buy flood up to amount of mortgage. If you have a 250K house you have to buy 250K worth of flood.

Most folks who are forced to buy expensive unnecessary flood try to pay of mortgage asap and drop flood.

My Fema guy told me all the cheap houses from Katrina many folks refused to raise them and just paid off their mortgages and dropped flood. To them why pay 5k a year to insure a small shack if they are getting 31,900 from Fema and each year they can bank 5k. So now New Orleans has a higher percentage of homes with no flood insurance than pre-katrina.

Even worse folks with no flood first time around are ineligible for a second fema payment so they will be out on street.

Forcing high flood insurance in low cost places with low income folks backfires after a few years.

I have flood on my house, but at around the 3k point I would just drop it. I rather roll dice invest the 3k each year and hope it works out. Trouble is in first few years if flood hits and enough people do like I do the whole neighbor hood will look like a war zone with abondoned houses and folks with flood big deal, you rebuild you house nice on a street full of abandoned homes.

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 | Report this
Terms of Use | Advertising | Careers | Contact Us | Community Links © 2015 Richner Communications, Inc.